Came to my attention as a headliner on a well known sadistic newspaper "Weather climate to match Serbia". Well, the Daily Liars have hit it again, they caught the attention of the ignorant. These days everyone finds it hard to trust some source of media, as to what they're being told. The Daily Mail seems to feel that they need to make fallacious posts on goings on in the UK. Now as we all know, the media mogul Mr. Murdoch controls a majority of the media in the UK. So, whether you like it or not, they'll always have the same target audience, as they can't contradict themselves when they try and praise a different branch of his enterprise. Before I start going off the rails on my original point, the weather will not match Serbia's. There is no way that the Daily Mail could find this information out. The Met office are THE people who distribute the weather forecast to its entirety and they have out right denied this allegation. So as we're aware, we're turning into a digital age where paper will one day become archaic and redundant to media. So, in order for people to turn to their local newspaper in contrast to switching on their computers, what better way is there to post a fallacious outrage on the front page, with something absurd as "Boy claims his killing was because of bad childhood when parents were raped by a gang of wolves."
Now as we're aware, there's a lot of controversy behind Facebook and its privacy issues. Whether you like it or not, your friends aren't the only people who can see your information. Ever wondered why it's a little bit coincidental to see an advert on the side advertising "Single Muslims near you" when you've posted your religious views as follows. Mark Zuckerburg sells your details so he can fill his capitalist pockets. Now, why would the media not try and exploit this in a different light and say that Zuckerburg's putting your privacy at jeopardy and that you can't be online without being mugged? Simply because he's in bed with them.
We must however compare this issue with another media mogul who's perceived in a very negative light; Julian Assange. Wikileaks has been put out to us all to exploit what is going on behind closed doors. His image is only tainted because that's how the media want him to look. He finds out all these details by legal means and contacts and posts it online for free. The other branches of media have him as a competitor as well as someone who puts them in a bad image, so their means of defence is to turn us against his work and gun him down.
Now to also make perhaps some wild conspiracy and perhaps give it some foundation, is to publicly announce it through a well known distributor. For instance, 'The Da Vinci Code' has been distributed to us through literature, by quite a literate man, which thus makes his theory of Jesus having children credible. "Anonymous" has now hit our screens, and who can honestly say that sitting through their school years studying Romeo and Juliet to tears, thought "Did he REALLY write this himself". Fact is, no. We haven't. It's slightly absurd to almost say that he stole all these plays himself, when truth would have come out after his tenth play. The only reason we start to question whether he did steal them is because someone has budgeted a film to tell us he has. That's mind manipulation at its best.
No comments:
Post a Comment