A new video on youtube has become viral and it's controversial to say the very least. To those of you who read this and don't know what I'm talking about, watch it now! But if you really canny be asked, then by all means I'll give you a quick run through. It's a video of some lady sat with a child, no older than 3 while she's sat there effing and blinding about how many immigrants were on the tram with them. I've heard a lot of mixed views about this video, mostly being negative of course!
It came to my attention however, the patriots saw light in what she was trying to say. They claimed that they shouldn't feel the minority in their own country and that we should have the right to always feel 'British'. I wan to know what people would define as 'British'? I'd define it as borders on a map in which people live and speak a different language. Shitty weather, bad food, cup of tea, fish and chips. Mary fucking Poppins. I don't know about any of you, but I don't see any of these eliminated from how I'd define this country. Still have constant shit weather. We still have crappy cuisines and loads of fish bars about. These people coming into our country really isn't tainting our culture and values. The only way people can define a country is what people live inside it.
People see these foreigners coming in as money scroungers and benefit layabouts, but in honesty; I have never met such hard workers. Those people who can't do, criticize. Fact is, I'm not denying there might be a few who miss the net and go straight on the dole, but in honesty - I know far more British people who are on the dole than any foreigner. It's human nature though, we're not stupid! If we're offered food and bed for no price, we take it! It's human nature, not 'paki' nature. We all have to stand back for a second and see that when we bleed, we bleed the same! Stick a knife in that lady, the blood's red, not gold. So where does she get off in saying it's HER Britiain?! We all make this country what it is. A country is like a curry, the variation of people act as a variation of spices. The more different spices the curry has, the better the outcome.
Monday, 28 November 2011
Thursday, 24 November 2011
Want to make your voice heard? Just don't do anything;
Now is it just me who remembers when the UK invaded Iraq? Over 1 million people gathered in central London to protest Blair's decision, but it sort of turned into water under the bridge. In fairness, there's not a lot that can be done about such a thing, at such a global scale. Seems protesting has turned from one thing to another, from corrupt political decision, greedy corporate industries grinding our countries into the grounds and just plain stupid ethical delusions.
During November 2010, the new Conservative party decided to triple the student fees. As we can all remember, the protest turned into a dirty riot. No matter how much the students kicked and screamed, they stuck to their guns and adhered to their new policy. Now, the true way to really fuck with their system and fight against it, is just plainly not doing anything at all. Let me explain, this new raise in fees is purely for financial reasons and if no one's there to pay for it, it just plainly doesn't work. My point is, no one should go to university for a year. And I mean, a serious blow to the system, but also educational jobs would be jeopardised too, so the plan on reformation would need a serious think over. Obviously, this a bit pie in the sky to be put into reality, but it's a thought and a true resolution.
The occupy wall street has gone on for a very long time now, pissed off people complaining that there are greedy people out there. Bankers are one of the main reasons for the financial meltdown we're all facing by giving themselves gross bonuses each year and tax avoiding. But, we must all put into perspective of how we're also to blame. I can't say I don't know one person who owes the bank money. The only way they grow in the capitalist world is by getting people riddled with debt, grabbing you by the balls and twisting to get every last bit. The simple way to avoid this was always, plainly being patient and save. Save your money and wait for whatever it is you're saving up for. Not going to the bloke in a shirt and tie asking for wads and hoping for a return. So, to play in their own game and fight against them, just don't borrow money from banks! I can proudly say, I don't, and never shall I own a credit card. When you owe someone something, they have you in their pocket. And once you're in their pocket, you have to play your life to their rules.
Now I could talk of the London riots in early August 2011, but that's plainly obvious isn't it. They were all a bunch of idiots, who weren't out there to fight for ethical justification on some drug lord gangbanger being shot, it was purely to exude their animalistic behaviour to have a reason to pilage, steal and destroy.
During November 2010, the new Conservative party decided to triple the student fees. As we can all remember, the protest turned into a dirty riot. No matter how much the students kicked and screamed, they stuck to their guns and adhered to their new policy. Now, the true way to really fuck with their system and fight against it, is just plainly not doing anything at all. Let me explain, this new raise in fees is purely for financial reasons and if no one's there to pay for it, it just plainly doesn't work. My point is, no one should go to university for a year. And I mean, a serious blow to the system, but also educational jobs would be jeopardised too, so the plan on reformation would need a serious think over. Obviously, this a bit pie in the sky to be put into reality, but it's a thought and a true resolution.
The occupy wall street has gone on for a very long time now, pissed off people complaining that there are greedy people out there. Bankers are one of the main reasons for the financial meltdown we're all facing by giving themselves gross bonuses each year and tax avoiding. But, we must all put into perspective of how we're also to blame. I can't say I don't know one person who owes the bank money. The only way they grow in the capitalist world is by getting people riddled with debt, grabbing you by the balls and twisting to get every last bit. The simple way to avoid this was always, plainly being patient and save. Save your money and wait for whatever it is you're saving up for. Not going to the bloke in a shirt and tie asking for wads and hoping for a return. So, to play in their own game and fight against them, just don't borrow money from banks! I can proudly say, I don't, and never shall I own a credit card. When you owe someone something, they have you in their pocket. And once you're in their pocket, you have to play your life to their rules.
Now I could talk of the London riots in early August 2011, but that's plainly obvious isn't it. They were all a bunch of idiots, who weren't out there to fight for ethical justification on some drug lord gangbanger being shot, it was purely to exude their animalistic behaviour to have a reason to pilage, steal and destroy.
Sunday, 6 November 2011
Wrap it in media, and they'll believe it
Came to my attention as a headliner on a well known sadistic newspaper "Weather climate to match Serbia". Well, the Daily Liars have hit it again, they caught the attention of the ignorant. These days everyone finds it hard to trust some source of media, as to what they're being told. The Daily Mail seems to feel that they need to make fallacious posts on goings on in the UK. Now as we all know, the media mogul Mr. Murdoch controls a majority of the media in the UK. So, whether you like it or not, they'll always have the same target audience, as they can't contradict themselves when they try and praise a different branch of his enterprise. Before I start going off the rails on my original point, the weather will not match Serbia's. There is no way that the Daily Mail could find this information out. The Met office are THE people who distribute the weather forecast to its entirety and they have out right denied this allegation. So as we're aware, we're turning into a digital age where paper will one day become archaic and redundant to media. So, in order for people to turn to their local newspaper in contrast to switching on their computers, what better way is there to post a fallacious outrage on the front page, with something absurd as "Boy claims his killing was because of bad childhood when parents were raped by a gang of wolves."
Now as we're aware, there's a lot of controversy behind Facebook and its privacy issues. Whether you like it or not, your friends aren't the only people who can see your information. Ever wondered why it's a little bit coincidental to see an advert on the side advertising "Single Muslims near you" when you've posted your religious views as follows. Mark Zuckerburg sells your details so he can fill his capitalist pockets. Now, why would the media not try and exploit this in a different light and say that Zuckerburg's putting your privacy at jeopardy and that you can't be online without being mugged? Simply because he's in bed with them.
We must however compare this issue with another media mogul who's perceived in a very negative light; Julian Assange. Wikileaks has been put out to us all to exploit what is going on behind closed doors. His image is only tainted because that's how the media want him to look. He finds out all these details by legal means and contacts and posts it online for free. The other branches of media have him as a competitor as well as someone who puts them in a bad image, so their means of defence is to turn us against his work and gun him down.
Now to also make perhaps some wild conspiracy and perhaps give it some foundation, is to publicly announce it through a well known distributor. For instance, 'The Da Vinci Code' has been distributed to us through literature, by quite a literate man, which thus makes his theory of Jesus having children credible. "Anonymous" has now hit our screens, and who can honestly say that sitting through their school years studying Romeo and Juliet to tears, thought "Did he REALLY write this himself". Fact is, no. We haven't. It's slightly absurd to almost say that he stole all these plays himself, when truth would have come out after his tenth play. The only reason we start to question whether he did steal them is because someone has budgeted a film to tell us he has. That's mind manipulation at its best.
Now as we're aware, there's a lot of controversy behind Facebook and its privacy issues. Whether you like it or not, your friends aren't the only people who can see your information. Ever wondered why it's a little bit coincidental to see an advert on the side advertising "Single Muslims near you" when you've posted your religious views as follows. Mark Zuckerburg sells your details so he can fill his capitalist pockets. Now, why would the media not try and exploit this in a different light and say that Zuckerburg's putting your privacy at jeopardy and that you can't be online without being mugged? Simply because he's in bed with them.
We must however compare this issue with another media mogul who's perceived in a very negative light; Julian Assange. Wikileaks has been put out to us all to exploit what is going on behind closed doors. His image is only tainted because that's how the media want him to look. He finds out all these details by legal means and contacts and posts it online for free. The other branches of media have him as a competitor as well as someone who puts them in a bad image, so their means of defence is to turn us against his work and gun him down.
Now to also make perhaps some wild conspiracy and perhaps give it some foundation, is to publicly announce it through a well known distributor. For instance, 'The Da Vinci Code' has been distributed to us through literature, by quite a literate man, which thus makes his theory of Jesus having children credible. "Anonymous" has now hit our screens, and who can honestly say that sitting through their school years studying Romeo and Juliet to tears, thought "Did he REALLY write this himself". Fact is, no. We haven't. It's slightly absurd to almost say that he stole all these plays himself, when truth would have come out after his tenth play. The only reason we start to question whether he did steal them is because someone has budgeted a film to tell us he has. That's mind manipulation at its best.
A sense of insecurity
People seem to find that the entire world is some show. We must thus adhere to this and put on some fass to hope that they approve of what we put out in front of them. You get this impression when you see women jumping from guy to guy; Their life is some kind of shipwreck and they're jumping from wreckage to wreckage until they reach dry land.
It's only began to dawn on me when I started work. People seem to think they really are the centre of some universe and we're surrounding them as if they're the nucleus of social interaction.
When a girl or boy is inadvertently dumped by their partners they claim that they let themselves go loose and wild because they're so hurt and messed up from the break up they need to make amends. This is utter horse shit. The fact is, they might have been left with a bit of a hole in their life, but by saying they're filling it with meaningless sex and gorging themselves seems a bit pretentious. The fact is, they've been trapped in this bond between two people and subconsciously, they've wanted to do it the whole time they've been together! Having been in this situation enough times that they could make some twisted rom-com from it all, not once have I had the impulse to fill the void with strangers. Using one person as some rebound might be another story; point is you're substituting that person for a lesser being. (Beggars can't be choosers, so to speak.)
Your insecurity should always be something that needs to come out the closet. It's what you need to send focus on so that then you don't try and make some mistake on people's judgement. Sometimes, learning not to care is the best way to resolving this issue. Insecurity creeps up on us at the best of times, and the point we all have to make is to try and tackle this head-on. And hard.
It's only began to dawn on me when I started work. People seem to think they really are the centre of some universe and we're surrounding them as if they're the nucleus of social interaction.
When a girl or boy is inadvertently dumped by their partners they claim that they let themselves go loose and wild because they're so hurt and messed up from the break up they need to make amends. This is utter horse shit. The fact is, they might have been left with a bit of a hole in their life, but by saying they're filling it with meaningless sex and gorging themselves seems a bit pretentious. The fact is, they've been trapped in this bond between two people and subconsciously, they've wanted to do it the whole time they've been together! Having been in this situation enough times that they could make some twisted rom-com from it all, not once have I had the impulse to fill the void with strangers. Using one person as some rebound might be another story; point is you're substituting that person for a lesser being. (Beggars can't be choosers, so to speak.)
Your insecurity should always be something that needs to come out the closet. It's what you need to send focus on so that then you don't try and make some mistake on people's judgement. Sometimes, learning not to care is the best way to resolving this issue. Insecurity creeps up on us at the best of times, and the point we all have to make is to try and tackle this head-on. And hard.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)